Court Acquits Brij Bhushan Singh in Wrestlers' Harassment Case

The Cliff News | 3 August 2026

The Rouse Avenue Court in Delhi on Monday delivered a verdict of acquittal for former BJP MP and ex-Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, along with co-accused Vinod Tomar, in the alleged sexual harassment case brought forth by women wrestlers.

The decision marks a significant turning point in a case that has garnered considerable national attention and sparked widespread debate surrounding issues of gender, power, and accountability in sports administration.

Court's Verdict and Singh's Reaction

The court's ruling found insufficient evidence to substantiate the charges against Singh and Tomar. Following the verdict, a visibly relieved Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, aged 69, addressed the media, expressing his stance on the proceedings.

"The day the accusation was leveled against me, I had said that if the charge were proven, I would willingly hang myself; today, the court has acquitted me and used the term 'honourably acquitted.' What's done is done."

Singh's statement underscored his consistent assertion of innocence throughout the investigation and trial. The term 'honourably acquitted' signifies a clear vindication from the court.

Background of the Allegations

The case stemmed from allegations of sexual harassment leveled by several women wrestlers against Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh during his tenure as WFI chief. These accusations led to widespread protests by athletes demanding justice and reforms within the wrestling federation.

The investigation and subsequent legal proceedings have been closely monitored, highlighting the complexities of pursuing justice in cases involving powerful figures and the challenges faced by victims in coming forward.

Legal Proceedings and Next Steps

The Rouse Avenue Court's acquittal means that the legal case against Singh and Tomar has concluded with their exoneration. The details of the court's reasoning for the acquittal are expected to be elaborated in the detailed judgment.

While the court's decision brings a close to this particular legal chapter, the broader implications for the sport of wrestling and the safety of athletes are likely to be subjects of continued discussion and scrutiny.