Over 14,000 Bears Killed in Japan in 10 Months, Raising Conservation Concerns
Japan culled over 14,000 bears in 10 months amid rising human attacks, sparking serious questions about wildlife conservation efforts.

Record Cull Amidst Rising Attacks
In response to a surge in bear attacks on humans, the Japanese government has undertaken a drastic measure, culling over 14,000 bears in approximately ten months. This extensive operation, conducted between April 2025 and January 2026, reportedly involved an estimated 12,000 Asian black bears and around 2,000 brown bears.
The unprecedented scale of this cull has raised serious questions about the state of wildlife conservation in Japan. The year 2025 proved particularly deadly for human-bear encounters, with over 230 attacks resulting in 13 fatalities, marking it as the deadliest year on record for Japan.
Attacks were notably concentrated in the northern prefectures of Akita and Iwate, highlighting specific regional challenges in managing human-wildlife conflict.
Habitat Loss and Food Scarcity Driving Bears Towards Settlements
Experts attribute the increasing presence of bears in villages and towns to a critical shortage of food in their natural forest habitats. Declines in essential food sources like beech nuts and acorns in the mountains are forcing bears to venture out of their territories in search of sustenance.
Climate change and the resulting scarcity of food resources in forests have exacerbated this problem. Many areas have experienced adverse effects on fruit and nut yields from trees. Furthermore, depopulation in rural Japan and the abandonment of agricultural land have narrowed the traditional buffer zones between humans and wildlife.
With fewer human activities in previously frequented rural areas, bears are experiencing reduced fear of human presence, making it easier for them to approach settlements in their pursuit of food.
Asian Black Bears Face Critical Threat
Among the over 14,000 bears killed, Asian black bears constitute the largest portion, with approximately 12,000 accounted for. This species is classified as 'vulnerable' globally, raising fears that continued culling at this rate could lead to local extinctions in certain regions.
Japan is home to a significant population of Asian black bears, estimated to be around 42,000. However, experts acknowledge the difficulty in accurately counting bear populations, suggesting the actual numbers could differ significantly.
Japan has initiated a new nationwide population survey process, which is expected to take approximately three years to complete.
Attacks Persist Despite Massive Cull
Despite the large-scale killing of bears, conflicts between humans and these animals have not ceased entirely. Since April 2026, at least six more individuals have died in bear attacks, with over 35 others injured. This ongoing situation prompts the question of whether merely reducing bear numbers is a sustainable solution.
Conservation experts argue that the root causes of the problem lie in food scarcity, changing forest dynamics, and the easy accessibility of human settlements for bears. These underlying issues require more comprehensive solutions than simply population control through culling.
Government's New Target and Conservationists' Worries
In addition to the current operation, the Japanese government has set a target to remove an additional 8,800 bears in the current fiscal year. The government justifies this by emphasizing the necessity of ensuring public safety and preventing bear attacks in populated areas.
Conversely, conservation organizations contend that killing such a large number of bears is not a long-term solution. They advocate for increased focus on strengthening security around settlements, keeping waste and food sources away from bears, proper management of fruit-bearing trees, and enhancing natural food availability in forests.
Escalating Scale of Historical Hunting
While Japan has historically culled bears annually to manage their populations, the scale of last year's operation was unprecedented. Available data indicates that between 2008 and 2018, approximately 1,000 to 4,500 bears were culled each year.
This number rose to over 9,000 in 2023-24, and the figure surpassed 14,000 in 2025-26, demonstrating a dramatic increase in culling efforts.
Experts Emphasize Alternative Strategies
Wildlife experts believe that preventing bear-human conflict should prioritize targeted and non-lethal measures over a sole reliance on large-scale culling. The example of Karuizawa, Japan, is often cited, where local specialists capture and relocate bears as needed and use trained dogs to deter them from human settlements.
This region has adopted a different strategy for a long time to mitigate human-bear conflicts, focusing on coexistence rather than eradication.
The Complex Challenge of Conservation vs. Human Safety
Japan faces the significant challenge of balancing human safety with wildlife conservation. While preventing bear attacks on citizens is the government's top priority, the large-scale killing of bears could have severe negative impacts on some local populations.
Experts warn that without a reliable assessment of the actual bear population, the risks associated with large-scale population control are amplified. If the true number of bears turns out to be lower than government estimates, continued mass culling could rapidly deplete regional populations.
Growing Impact of Environmental Changes
Japan's current situation serves as a stark illustration of how climate change, rural depopulation, and shifts in natural habitats can intensify human-wildlife conflicts. When forests lack food, wildlife is drawn towards human settlements, which ultimately leads to their culling for safety reasons.
The death of over 14,000 bears has ignited a new and serious debate on Japan's wildlife conservation policy. If problems related to food and habitat in bear habitats are not addressed, and non-lethal measures for settlement safety are not effectively implemented, the long-term effectiveness of a population reduction strategy remains a significant question mark.
