Dhirendra Shastri Says “No Forward–Backward in India, Only Indians” Amid UGC Row; Appeals Govt Not to Divide People

As the nationwide debate over the UGC’s new guidelines intensifies, Bageshwar Dham chief Pandit Dhirendra Krishna Shastri has made a strong appeal to the government, urging leaders and institutions not to divide people on caste lines.

Speaking during a religious event, Shastri said the country needs more unity, not new labels.

⭐ “In India, there is no forward or backward — we are all Indians”

Addressing devotees, Shastri said:

“Bhaiya, hum logon ko mat baantिए. India mein koi aage-peeche nahi — sab Bharatiya hain.”

(Don’t divide us. There is no forward-backward in India; we are all Indians.)

He stressed that caste discrimination has harmed society for decades and should not be allowed to influence future policies.

⭐ UGC Guidelines Trigger National Debate

The controversy began after new UGC regulations led to:

Heated debate across colleges and universities

Political parties accusing each other of caste-based discrimination

Social media discourse over reservation, equity, and merit

Shastri’s remarks come at a time when the issue has become politically charged.

⭐ Calls for ‘Ek Bharat, Ek Bharatiya’

Rejecting caste-based differentiation, Shastri said India should move towards:

One identity: Indian

One national outlook

One social fabric where every citizen feels equal

He urged leaders to focus on policies that bring people together rather than create new fault lines.

⭐ Why His Remarks Matter

Dhirendra Shastri’s statements hold weight because:

He has a large following across multiple states

His messages often spark national conversation

He influences youth and rural communities where caste identity is deeply rooted

Political analysts say his comment could intensify the debate around UGC rules and caste categorisation.

⭐ Background: What Is the UGC Row About?

The new UGC framework has been criticised for:

Introducing categories some believe may deepen social divides

Failing to clarify how new classifications will impact students

Raising fears about potential misuse in admissions and job allocation

Supporters argue the changes aim to promote inclusiveness and transparency, but the public remains divided.